![](\"https:\/\/1.bp.blogspot.com\/-v_gWBf81F4c\/WTrBq_jMoHI\/AAAAAAAANKY\/fkctxtOgVdYvrViktNFemgAUuKspg1oyQCLcB\/s1600\/What%2Bto%2Bdo%2Bwhen%2Ban%2Bagent%2Bsays--I%2527d%2Blove%2Bto%2Bsee%2Bthis%2Bagain%2Bif%2Byou%2Brevise-.png\")
<\/a><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\nThe Logistics of Handling a Revise and Resubmit from a Literary Agent by Tracy Gold<\/h3>\n
\nQuerying literary agents is complicated enough when you\u2019re handling requests, rejections, and offers of representation. <\/p>\n
However, as I wrote in my last post, about the basics of querying<\/a>, sometimes, agents give you an in-between: a revise and resubmit.<\/p>\n Revise and resubmits take many different forms, but they can be a great way for you to find out if you like working with the agent, and vice versa.<\/p>\n From working as an agent intern and watching hundreds of writers\u2019 journeys via participating as a Pitch Wars<\/a> mentee for two years, I\u2019ve seen a lot of writers\u2019 experiences with R&Rs. In this post, I\u2019ll cover the different types of revise and resubmits, and the logistics of how you should handle each. <\/p>\n Only Revise if The Feedback Fits Your Vision<\/b> There\u2019s also nothing wrong in letting feedback rest. You don\u2019t have to decide whether you are going to revise right away, or even in a month. The offer to look again does not expire (though, of course, markets do change). <\/p>\n Don\u2019t Be A Jerk<\/b> When you\u2019re communicating with an agent, remember to check yourself before you wreck yourself. Put yourself in the agent\u2019s shoes and think about how they could interpret your communication. Remember that you are not entitled to any given agent\u2019s time or attention. Don\u2019t freak out too much, though. Most agents love helping authors create amazing books, and will understand the difference between an honest mistake and being a jerk. Don\u2019t freak out too much, though. Generally, as long as you are being a nice person, if you cluelessly break some unspoken rule, the worst that could happen is an agent gets a little annoyed, doesn\u2019t respond, or turns you down. I doubt they\u2019d hold it against you when you\u2019re ready to reach out with your next project.<\/p>\n However, if you are a jerk, that agent could spread the word to other agents and essentially get you blacklisted in the industry. A screencap of your email could even be shared on Twitter, to the delight and consternation of all of the nice, reasonable authors and agents out there. <\/p>\n So, you know, don\u2019t be a jerk. Unless, of course, you\u2019re a highly entertaining jerk, in which case, I\u2019d ask that you give me a heads up so I can get my popcorn and log on to Twitter.<\/p>\n The Generic Revise and Resubmit<\/b> In that case, I would be shy about reaching back out and asking for more details before you tackle a revision, but I would feel free to write back to them again if you do indeed revise. Give them a brief overview of what you changed and send back the same materials they had originally (query, partial, full). You can either reply to the same email, or write a new one. Every agent has a different way of managing their submissions and there\u2019s no way you can predict that system. Of course, if they use a query manager system and won\u2019t see your email, you have no choice but to reach out with a new query via that system. Most of the time, though, \u201crevise and resubmits\u201d will skip the query line.<\/p>\n The Specific, Enthusiastic, Revise and Resubmit<\/b> If an agent has a phone call with you to discuss revisions, that\u2019s a great sign. That means they loved your story enough to invest a lot of their time into it. Feel free to reach out to that agent with questions. However, I suggest doing as much of the work as possible on your end. Come up with specific ideas about what you could change in the book and run them by the agent, or even implement your revision ideas on a few chapters and ask if you can send over those chapters for feedback before you revise the entire manuscript.<\/p>\n Some agents almost always ask for revisions, even surface-level revisions, to test how you will work together before offering representation. This is your chance to see what it is like to work with that agent as much as it is their chance to see what it\u2019s like to work with you.<\/p>\n However, even a phone call R&R is no guarantee the agent will represent your work, and you should still only revise if the feedback speaks to you.<\/p>\n Not all specific R&Rs come via phone calls. Sometimes, agents will write you a long email with super detailed feedback and ask to see your work again. I\u2019ve had friends receive emails like this, and crestfallen, believe their work was rejected. I had to do the text message equivalent of shaking one friend when I told her that her now-agent had not rejected her. She had given her an R&R! This is good news, not sad news (though of course we\u2019d all love an offer of representation right away). If you get an email like this, feel free to email back and forth with that agent just like you\u2019d gotten a phone call. I wouldn\u2019t, however, ask that agent for a phone call to discuss the revisions. That could come off as a little presumptive, and if the agent is like me, they might prefer email to phone calls. We are in an industry filled with book-loving introverts, after all! However, I\u2019ve heard of agents offering a phone call along the way if they think that would be best. <\/p>\n For this kind of R&R, if in doubt, I would ask the agent about how they would like you to communicate. My bet is that they will ask you to reply to the original email thread with questions and keep them posted on the project. If you\u2019re feeling shy or like you might annoy them, it can\u2019t hurt to communicate about the best way to communicate. After all, this could turn into your agent in the long-term, and setting guidelines for the best way to communicate is a great idea for any business (or personal!) relationship.<\/p>\n On Exclusive R&Rs<\/b> On the other hand, the agent who gave you the R&R put in the time and effort to work with you on the manuscript. That deserves some bonus points, even if it\u2019s only mentally. It is up to you whether you want to agree to exclusivity for an R&R. If you decide to give a head start, I would recommend giving a limited time period, like three weeks. If the agent hasn\u2019t gotten back to you by then, feel free to reach out to the others. Just know that if you do end up getting an offer from the R&R agent, you might end up angering those who had your older version.<\/p>\n If you don\u2019t have an exclusive R&R, you should let all the other agents who have your manuscript know you have a revised version. I\u2019ll go into a little more detail about how and when to do that in the next section.<\/p>\n How to Manage Revising and Querying<\/b> Everyone will tell you to stop sending out new queries. That\u2019s an easy one. If you get requests during this period, explain the nature of your unexpected feedback and ask the requesting agents to hold off until you have completed the revisions. <\/p>\n The hard part is whether to ask agents who have your full or partial manuscript to hold off on reading. Sometimes, contests like Pitch Wars will require that you reach out to agents and ask them to stop reading while you revise. If you see clear and convincing flaws with your manuscript and you\u2019re very gung-ho about doing some major revisions, I would recommend asking agents to pause. In my observation, agents are fine with this 99% of the time. They don\u2019t want to waste their time reading a manuscript that\u2019s not your best. <\/p>\n Other times, you may dive into revisions not fully knowing how drastically your story is going to change or whether you\u2019re even going to like the newer version of the manuscript better. You may get to the end of the revision and realize that you liked the manuscript better the old way, even though you gave the revision a fair shot. If you are unsure of the extent or promise of your revisions, I would not reach out to the agents who have your manuscript and ask them to pause. Instead, when you are done, if you are confident in the revisions and they go beyond minor edits, reach out to the agents who have the manuscript and very apologetically ask them if they will consider reading the new version. Give them an out like \u201cI understand if you have already made your decision on the old version.\u201d Most of the time, they will be happy to read this version. Agents have a lot on their plates and often won\u2019t have started your book by the time you reach out. Sometimes, though, they will tell you that they have already decided to pass on your old version. Sometimes, they won\u2019t even respond. This is par for the course.<\/p>\n Note<\/i>: don\u2019t reach out to agents if you find a few small things to change or typos in your manuscript. No one is going to reject you over a few typos. Now, if you have mistakes and typos on every page, that\u2019s another story, but you shouldn\u2019t be sending out a manuscript in that shape in the first place. <\/p>\n Talking Yourself into an R&R<\/b> You can also sometimes turn rejections into R&Rs. If you get specific feedback in a rejection from an agent that inspires you to revise, it can be appropriate to (very cautiously) reply and ask the agent if they would be open to taking another look at a revised manuscript. Guage how to move forward based on their response. If they respond with more detailed feedback, feel free to keep the lines of communication open and treat it like a revise and resubmit. If they say something short and sweet, like \u201csure,\u201d I would be a bit more cautious.<\/p>\n In Conclusion<\/b> Feel free to comment with your experiences or additional questions. <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Tracy Gold is a writer, teacher, and editor living in Baltimore, Maryland. She interns for literary agent Carrie Pestritto and is a two-time Pitch Wars mentee. Her writing is published in YARN<\/i>, Youth Imagination<\/i>, The Stoneslide Corrective<\/i>, and several other magazines. Tracy cofounded Sounding Sea Writers\u2019 Workshop, which provides tutoring, editing, and writing classes. Tracy is also a composition instructor at The University of Baltimore, where she earned her M.F.A. in Fiction. Tracy is currently seeking representation for a young adult novel about a girl who starts a business to sell revenge, and writing another one. When Tracy\u2019s not working or writing, she\u2019s hanging out with her rescue dog and horse.<\/p>\n Website<\/a> | Twitter<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Today we welcome Tracy Gold back to the blog with a fabulously detailed step-by-step post on how to handle R&Rs (revise and resubmit requests) from literary agents. As Tracy says, we’d all love to get a quick acceptance the first time we query. But, alas, that doesn’t always happen. Having worked as an agent intern […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":12505,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[312],"tags":[24,197,198,199,200],"class_list":["post-12504","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-imported-from-ayap","tag-craft-of-writing","tag-rrs","tag-revise-and-resubmits","tag-revision-and-editing","tag-tracy-gold"],"yoast_head":"\n
\nIn any revise and resubmit scenario, you should only revise if you think doing so will make the book better, and if the feedback matches your vision for the book. I\u2019m not saying you have to be excited about the revision, at least not at first, because revision can be emotional and scary. But you should feel a sense of purpose in your revisions, and sense that the agent \u201cgets\u201d your book. <\/p>\n
\nThere are no guarantees with revising and resubmitting. Just because you have done revisions for a specific agent doesn\u2019t mean that agent is going to want to represent you when they read the new version. Besides, another agent could love a part of the book one agent wants you to remove. Loving books is subjective. Figure out what your vision is for the book and evaluate revision ideas based on that vision. <\/p>\n
\nSometimes writers can come off as jerks because of ignorance of how the industry works. Working with a literary agent is not like hiring a real estate agent or insurance agent. Literary agents get hundreds\u2014even thousands\u2014of queries a month, and some only take on a few new clients a year. Most agents have seen every variety of rude, arrogant, and sometimes downright scary author behavior under the sun, and thus have their guards up.<\/p>\n
\nOften, agents have different tiers of form rejections: one rejection they send to everyone, and one rejection they send for work they liked but didn\u2019t love, for whatever reason. The \u201ctier two\u201d rejection often includes something like \u201cPlease query me with future work.\u201d Some agents also include a note that they would be open to reading another draft of the same manuscript in their form rejections. This may look something like \u201cIf you choose to revise, please feel free to resend.\u201d If this comes at the end of a fairly vague rejection\u2014especially if that rejection is just on a query or a partial manuscript\u2014it is likely part of a form rejection. <\/p>\n
\nSometimes, writers will have a call with an agent, get excited that this is going to be it\u2014the offer of representation!\u2014and then have the heart-crushing realization that the agent wants to see a revision before offering representation. <\/p>\n
\nSometimes, when agents give you feedback, they will ask for a head start to consider your newest version. This can put you in a tricky situation. If that agent eventually offers on your manuscript, you would be expected to reach out to all of the agents who have your full manuscript (and those you\u2019ve queried recently) and give them a chance to make counter-offers. The other agents may be miffed to find out you sent out a new version of your manuscript and they didn\u2019t know about it. <\/p>\n
\nIf you find yourself in the position of revising while you still have queries and full manuscripts out with agents, this can be a tricky situation. While it\u2019s best to revise your manuscript several times before you query agents, sometimes, you will get unexpected feedback or wisdom from conferences that you\u2019re inspired to act on. I\u2019ve been in this situation myself, and agents, editors, and other writers will give you conflicting advice on what to do. <\/p>\n
\nIf you have a new-and-improved manuscript, consider reaching out to agents who rejected your old version and seeing if they would consider it again. If you got \u201cliked it, didn\u2019t love it\u201d rejections, or rejections that praised your talent and asked to see future work, it can\u2019t hurt to see if those agents would read your newest version. Again, be sure to give the agent an easy out\u2014something like \u201cI know you\u2019re extremely busy and totally understand if the answer is no, but would you be willing to take a look at a revised version?\u201d Sometimes, they will say yes. <\/p>\n
\nThat\u2019s my take on how to manage R&Rs! I\u2019m sure you will find conflicting advice on how to handle these situations, but remember, as long as you approach the situation with respect for the agent\u2019s time, and you\u2019re trying to be nice, the worst that can happen is that you get rejected. And that\u2019s not the end of the world. <\/p>\n\nAbout the Author:<\/h3>\n
<\/a><\/div>\n